Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel


Embed this content in your HTML

Search

Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Showcase


Channel Catalog


Channel Description:

Most recent forum messages

older | 1 | .... | 9325 | 9326 | (Page 9327) | 9328 | 9329 | .... | 9388 | newer

    0 0

    Have you rendered the timeline?

    Select everything in the timeline and then go to the menu Sequence > Render Selection

     

    MtD


    0 0

    Thanks, but I tried that. Didn't help.


    0 0

    I am a new Premiere Pro user and just learning about the Essential Graphics panel.  I was working with the sample files from the Lynda.com series, and found my way to the motion graphics templates on the Essential Graphics panel with no problem.  However, I am unable to hover scrub over any of the motion graphics templates (I've tried several that I am pretty sure do include motion) and Premiere Pro will not allow me to drag and drop any of the templates onto my timeline.

     

    Everything else that I've tried to with Premiere Pro has been working normally, so I'm pretty sure this is some simple setting that I've overlooked.

     

    Thanks in advance for any help you can offer!

     

    Premiere Pro v 12.1.2

    MacBook Pro mid 2014

    OS Mojave 10.14.2


    0 0
  • 01/12/19--09:25: Importing X-OCN Files LUT
  • When I import Sony X-OCN files (4k captured on Sony Venice) that were captured in Log, the Rec709 LUT is automatically applied.  It’s as if it was burned in during capture.  I can't find any place to pull off the LUT and see Log.  I’ve checked the effects panel and no Lumetri filters are applied.

     

    This is not a problem when importing XAVC 4k files.  They show up in Log.  It's only for X-OCN.

     

    I imported the files into DaVinci and can see that they were in fact recorded in Log.  So this is a Premiere issue.

     

    Anyone have any answers?

     

    Thanks

    Michael


    0 0

    That did not help unfortunately. Do you think it would make a difference if I exported the files as png's instead of jpeg's before putting them in premiere?


    0 0

    Thank you Neil for your answer but i know what you explained, the only right solution for me is to use Colorista IV because premiere have bugs with lumetri and luts. So i  strongly recommend for everybody to use Colorista to work normally without aleatory lumetri bugs.


    0 0

    What are the properties of the source images? (Pixel dimensions, codec, etc)

    What are you sequence settings? (Go to the menu Sequence > Sequence Settings and post a screen shot of the panel that opens)

     

    MtD


    0 0

    1. 24fps is what u see in cinemas. Its the "sweet spot"of frame rates that was developed decades ago. It gives the most "filmic" interpretation of movement. That nice soft, rich feel to

    23.976 is used for broadcast quality and while the difference between the 2 looks negligible, when you view them side by side on a very large screen you WILL see the difference,. 23.976fps is used for tv broadcasts etc, not film.

     

    2. Why are you interpreting footage? Is your main timeline 24fps? If yes then I would say yes, interpret the footage. Its important that your sequence frame rate and footage match one another for a seamless edit

     

    3. 59.16fps? Thats a really odd frame rate. What was this shot on?

     

    Mo


    0 0

    The source images are 72dpi and they're jpeg's with 843 × 597 dimensions.

     

    Screenshot 2019-01-12 at 18.43.52.png

    I exported the source images as png and it has fixed the problem! But I'd still like to hear from you if you see anything wrong with the settings or source image details : )


    0 0

    Ha! I solved it myself.  I had to open the file in the source viewer first and select s-log, then drag to timeline.  Different workflow from XAVC files.

     

    Thanks


    0 0

    Does selecting the clip(s) in the Project Panel, then right clicking and choosing Disable Masterclip Effects help?

     

    MtD


    0 0

    It's good to know I'm not the only one with this problem. It's been a while since a client asked for a MOV video so when I tried to export and didn't see the options I needed, I thought there was something wrong with my program. I guess I'll just have to do what you suggested.


    0 0

    Hi, i got audio bugs during playback. Signal goes on&off randomly between channels or just playing a single track!

    I tried to change prefrences, audio output/input, format...nothing happens!

    Footage is from URSA Mini (prores codec- audio 48KHz 24bit)

    windows 10pro

    premier_2019 at last update

     

    any suggestion?

    thx


    0 0

    I have no specific recommendation.  You can try some of the troubleshooting steps, see if anything helps.

     

    Unofficial Premiere Pro Troubleshooting Guide


    0 0

    That sounds like a redraw issue.  Post up the graphics hardware and driver version.  For now, stick with one machine.  Too many variables can be overwhelming.


    0 0
    0 0

    "Variants of this question have been covered to death on this and every other color grading forum. The answer is always the same.  The only way to get a [proper] image you can trust is to run SDI [or HDMI] out to an accurately calibrated reference monitor.  Grading by viewing the image in the GUI just doesn't work."  - Jamie LeJeune

     

    B&H Photo Video


    0 0

    I already have Cuda enabled,

     

    Then it is being used where it can.


    0 0
  • 01/12/19--10:15: Re: lumetri looks off screen
  • The sole purpose of higher resolutions is more screen real estate.  You negate that when you set Display Scaling over 100%.

     

    If things are too small at 100%, you need a physically larger monitor.  I recommend at least 32" for UHD.


    0 0

    This might be an intentional change from Adobe.  You're manually selecting something.  I can see why the editor would not want the auto-select to function in that case.

     

    Deselect first, then auto-select resumes.  This behavior makes sense to me.  I would consider it an improvement.


older | 1 | .... | 9325 | 9326 | (Page 9327) | 9328 | 9329 | .... | 9388 | newer