When you have time, try to revise the conversation.
You started from the accusation that Harm's severe warning was based upon money.
When you was explained by many Forum participants the real matter, you rushed to incriminating dilettantism to one of most respectful hardware experts here (not sure you realise how funny you sound) and decided to invent something about thousand Euros a user have to spend on codecs in case he doesn't use K-Lite codec pack, which is a simple lie.
When you was proposed to write an article about troubleshooting issues caused by K-Lite, you started to argue that that was not the point, and you can't offer anything apart from restoring OS from backup point so as to get rid of K-Lite completely (which is definitely the time saver compared to reinstalling OS from scratch, but doesn't change the nature of the solution).
Congratulations and good luck!